(With apologies to Daniel Dennett)
Sitting quietly in what best seems called – in Krishnamurti’s phrase – “choiceless awareness” involves
paying attention to the sensation of the breath (this settles the mind and body), but then the instruction is to let our attention rest on whatever is most prominent in our field of awareness… awakening by engaging the whole of our experience fully, however it presents itself… (Toni Bernhard)
Now of course “whatever is most prominent in our field of awareness” can often not be the sound of traffic on the road at the end of the garden, or the calls of the jackdaws settling down for the evening under the roof of the old water tower, nor even the slight discomfort in one’s left knee, but some thought, profound or (usually) pointless. And then the temptation is to follow the thought: to begin to cogitate, or ruminate, to calculate. What to do about it?
In some systems of meditation thoughts can be overlaid with a mantra (the nembutsu for instance) to which the attention is transferred, thus allowing the thought to die away naturally. The problem here is not only that the mantra will supplant open awareness itself, but that a mantra has content. It means something. Inevitably it has a religious context, and drags all manner of baggage in its wake. (The nembutsu involves the name of Amida Buddha, and the myths around Amida, and the several Amidist philosophies, and so on and on.)
Another approach is to anchor attention solidly, usually to the breath, not allowing it to stray. But then once more our open awareness has been replaced with focused attention, the quiet engagement of awareness with whatever is, that is central to our practice, replaced with a muscular effort of will.
But of course a thought is only another object of awareness. When we hear the blackbird singing in the hazels at the back of the garden his voice forms the object of our awareness – a response in the auditory cortex in our temporal lobes – and choiceless awareness would leave it at that. So with the thought. If we can leave it as just another object of awareness, rather than as the beginning of a train of thought, and return to the breath, the next object – a sound outside, a breath, a rumble in the tummy, another breath – that is all that is needed. And if we fail? Well, the train of thought we’ve just boarded is only another object of attention, and then we can return to the creak of the trees, the solidity of the floor, the quiet changes that pass, just what is…

Pingback: I’ve been thinking… | Silent Assemblies
Thanks, Mike. A good description of shikantaza or ‘just sitting’. I agree with you about mantras, which I find just tend to get in the way (and, in my case at any rate, do not lessen all those stray thoughts). Why fill up your mind when you want to empty it? For a Daoist take on this you might be interested in ‘Daoist Meditation’ by Wu Jyh Cherng, which talks about two methods – ‘Fasting the Heart’ and ‘Sitting and Forgetting’. The Daoist tradition has less ‘religious’ baggage (in the sense of Buddhism or Christianity) on the whole.
LikeLike
Thanks, Tom! We’re away for a few days, but when we’re back I’ll investigate Wu Jyh Cherng. I’ve a lot of sympathy with classical Taoism, but I know little or nothing about its contemporary incarnation(s)!
LikeLike